Tucker: Rittenhouse trial taught us this
Weve been force fed heres one example. Just days after written house was first arrested, that was back in august of 2020 a pro censorship organization called politifact published what it called a fact check of the case. In a posting on its website, politifact claimed that kyle rittenhouse had committed a crime by carrying a firearm in the state of wisconsin heres, the quote: it is against the law in wisconsin for someone younger than 18 to possess a dangerous weapon period. Now you notice in that statement complete unwavering certainty, and this is common for political fact, which issues opinions like their edicts from god himself. They do this because the social media companies reward it. Social media companies use politifacts edicts as a pretext to censor any speech online. That contradicts the official line of the democratic party. The so called narrative, so politifact disagrees with what youre posting. Then you are by definition, spreading misinformation and you must be silenced, thats how it works. So naturally, other media organizations echoed this position immediately. Kyle rittenhouse 17 declared the milwaukee journal. Sentinel was not old enough to legally carry the assault style rifle. He had end quote again, just stating it as fact, and then the entire national media followed suit and told us the same thing. The problem was, it was a lie, in fact, under wisconsin law, which apparently no one in any newsroom in america, had even bothered to check 17 year olds are allowed to carry rifles as long as their barrels meet a minimum length requirement and kyle rittenhouses rifle met That requirement, so no kyle rittenhouse did not violate wisconsins gun laws.
Today, even the prosecution at the trial was forced to admit that, and so immediately the judge dismissed the firearms charge, isnt legal. It is not a short barreled, shotgun or a short barreled rifle yes, either by barrel or by overall length, correct, all right and then count to six is dismissed. Oh well, that couldnt be clearer. The prosecution is admitting in open court that it was legal. He had not committed a gun crime, and that means that for more than a year, big tech and its lackeys throughout our media have spread misinformation about kyle rittenhouse. Well, thats, embarrassing. What are they going to say? Well, theyre, not going to admit it. Of course, theyre going to make certain you dont, learn about it just minutes after the judge in the case dismissed the gun charge youtube, which is owned by google, censored the video streams of several independent legal experts who were commenting on the trial in real time. These were knowledgeable attorneys, many of whom were critical of the obvious weaknesses in the prosecutions case now hundreds of people were watching those streams. At the moment they were canceled but concerned that americans might conclude that kyle rittenhouse is innocent, youtube, shut them down, citing quote policy violations; in other words, god forbid people think for themselves: thats not not allowed anymore. If you want to know whats happening in your world, youve got msnbc to tell you watch here. We have a 17 year old kid under age said he bought an ar 15 because he thought it was cool.
He drove across state had his mother driving across state lines. He appointed himself a militia member, he goes around and he ends up unloading. What 60 rounds amazing hes blonde. Now of all the people, you could find to comment on a killing its interesting who they chose, but just listen to the words. Consider how totally dishonest the summary you just heard is virtually every word is a lie: kyle rittenhouse wasnt, a militia member. He was a lifeguard kyle rittenhouse did not fire 60 rounds, not even close to that. He was not underage, as we just told you, he was in legal possession of his gun, but most amazing is the claim which youre hearing everywhere right now that kyle rittenhouse is bad because he quote: drove across state lines. Think about that for just a second. So the very same people who have told you for years that borders are, by definition, white supremacy, now claim its some kind of moral offense for an american citizen to enter a contiguous state theyre, making it sound like how written have snuck into a foreign land under Cover of darkness to murder people thats, not quite what happened, take a look at this map. This is kyle rittenhouses drive from his mothers home in antioch illinois to kenosha wisconsin. It is by the map, says 21. Our map program says 17 miles, either way, probably shorter than your commute to work. Every morning, as kyle rittenhouse explained on the stand last week when mob set fire to kenosha, he had every reason to want to defend the city because his father lives there, but you decided you needed to run because of the fire on the duramax.
Yes, why? What was so urgent, it was a fire. Why did you feel that you should go around off the 59th street car source property and put out fires to make sure my community didnt get burnt down and help? Let me say your community: you mean kenosha, yes again, youre from antioch youre, not living in kenosha at this time. When this all happens right, my dad lives in kenosha. How dare you put out fires? Well, my dad lives in kenosha bet. You didnt know that, but you hadnt heard it on cnn, nor of any of the people hyperventilating about crossing state lines explained why its okay for the blm rioters and the antifa creeps to come from around the country to burn kenosha down, as many of them did. Havent even addressed that its kind of weird it wasnt a crime for them to cross state lines we could go on. But if theres one thing, this trial has taught us its how completely dishonest and totally misleading. So many of the news accounts of what kyle rittenhouse did have been weve known for more than a year, for example, how rittenhouse first encountered convicted child rapist joseph rosenbaum, the first man he shot. There are multiple witnesses to that most of its on video. Actually joseph rosenbaum had just been released from a mental hospital and for some reason decided to join the riot, so first he lit a fire. Then he began to swing a chain like a weapon.
When he saw kyle rittenhouse he threatened to kill kyle rittenhouse. Then he chased rittenhouse and he full sprint cornered him and then tried to snatch his gun from his hands. It was at that point that rittenhouse fired, who wouldnt fire at that point. After shooting rosenbaum written house tried to turn himself into police, but he couldnt, because a mob howling for his death chased him down a city street. One rider then knocked kyle rittenhouse to the ground. Another smashed him in the head with a skateboard and a third rider drew a loaded pistol which he was not allowed to have, unlike kyle rittenhouse and pointed it in kyle rittenhouses face. So at no point was kyle rittenhouse, the aggressor. In the sequence of events, every move he made was defensive, its not our interpretation of it thats what came out from prosecutors and witnesses in court. None of these facts are disputed. They all happened so thats, a very tough problem for the prosecution with facts like those. What exactly do you say what they said is really interesting. So today the prosecutor was left trying to argue that convicted child rapist mental patient, joseph rosenbaum, whose criminal record you can read online, and you should just to get a sense of who theyre defending here, that this guy had threatened to murder, kyle rittenhouse in front of Witnesses and yet actually, he was not a threat to cal written house and to prove it. The prosecutor showed this video watch here is the defendant running in between those parked cars slowing down, and you can see just how close, or rather how far away mr rosenbaum was when the defendant shot him i mean seriously, you can see just how close i mean.
Sorry, just how far away he was right, yeah, so everyone whose eyes were open could actually see it, because you just played the tape dumbo. Apparently the prosecution is hoping. The jury had his eyes closed for that part of the proceedings. The whole thing is ridiculous and it got more absurd as the day progressed. Watch that prosecutor thomas binger whos. Writing these names anyway. Explain that if you take steps to defend yourself, you have by definition, given up your right to self defense. They have to convince you that joseph rosenbaum was going to take that gun and use it on the defendant, because they know you cant, claim self defense against an unarmed man like this, you lose the right to self defense when youre the one who brought the gun Whos. Writing the rules here lets just pause for a second and go through what he said. Theres no such thing as self defense against a man who has no gun really well. According to the federal governments, own statistics, far more people in this country are beaten to death every year than are killed by ar 15s. So that is a by definition. Ridiculous claim, if an ex con with a history of violent crime informs you that he is going to murder you and then tries to grab your gun from your hands. You are allowed to respond. In fact, you have to respond because it would be suicidal not to obviously, but as a legal matter.
All that matters here is whether kyle rittenhouse reasonably believed that his life was in danger and, of course, he believed that why wouldnt he? You would believe that too. If you were him, but its the second part of the prosecutors lie, that tells you the most about how these people think heres, the quote. You lose the right to self defense when youre the one that brought the gun really mr binger, so no one with a concealed carry permit is allowed to defend himself whats the point of having a gun. If you cant, save your own life with it. Well, thats, exactly what theyre telling you theyre telling you dont have that right! You have no right to resist thats the whole point of this whole proceeding so the next time blm sweeps into your town, your neighborhood, your house to burn and loot and brandish weapons. You had better not try to protect yourself or your family, try to protect yourself or your family, and we will charge you with murder and, while were at it. Well, have the national media call you racist in the court of public opinion, theyre really arguing that white men, especially white men with a gun, are allowed and have the space to defend and protect a country and a social order that keeps them at the top and A country that they stole from indigenous folks and built with black peoples labor the media is participating and perpetuating this charade, because, as far as i can tell, the only reason why any of this is allowed is because of the whiteness of it all so who emptied The gender studies department and put them all on television all at once.
How destructive is this to the country seriously putting crap like that on television, if youre wondering, can they racialize anything? The answer is yes, they can, in this case there is to restate the obvious. No racial angle to the story and, if youre looking for proof, consider the fact that everybody involved in the story is the same color and in fact, in point of fact, the only bigot on the scene appears to have been joseph rosenbaum. The child rapist. For some reason and its on video dont take our word for it: rosenbaum kept screaming the n word huh, and yet its kyle rittenhouse, who joe biden accused of being a white supremacist on the basis of no evidence whatsoever and lets hope at some point he gets Sued for that now, theyre calling the judge the same thing too watch lets hope for one oclock, i dont know the hope. The asian food isnt coming its not isnt on one of those boats in long long, beach, harbor. Yes, that was the judge making an off color joke about asian food during a murder trial. I want to ask you how unusual is the judges conducts currently well? I think some of the things were way out of line. You know the comment about the asian food, for example: oh yeah, thats, thats racist, but really its only racist if youre exercising your right to self defense or, if youre, trying to conduct a fair trial.
If you dont inject equity into the trial and judge people on the basis of their skin color, rather than what they actually did, if you dare to do that in this post equity country, this post, blm nation – you are, by definition a racist, so they wont admit To the public that they lied to all of us for more than a year, this is all they have left youre. A racist msnbc is by far the worst defender, its shocking. Actually, when you look at it carefully, but its not the only offender theyre all doing this cnns, so called race and equity team, can you even imagine what those people are like? In any case, they just published a piece entitled that were not making this up quote. Judge in kyle, rittenhouse trial makes inappropriate asian food joke inappropriate being the favored word of people who want to slur someone who want to attack someones reputation without explaining exactly why inappropriate. What does that mean its entirely subjective, but according to the piece, as it gets more specific, the judges joke about supply chains and food puts asians quote in the cross hairs of microaggression, as well as actual physical violence Laughter. So when you make a joke about chinese takeout, which, by the way, if you were a bigot, you probably wouldnt be eating in the first place. But if you dare to make that joke, youre dangerous. If youre the judge and you havent already unilaterally given kyle rittenhouse the death penalty for offending msnbc and joe scarborough, then youre a physical threat to asian people, these people are demented and theyre dangerous and that kind of talk degrades the social fabric faster than everything anything You can imagine, but if youre looking for true crazy, no one beats the race lady over at msnbc.
Earlier today, the teenager accused of murdering two men and wounding a third in kenosha wisconsin last year, took to the stand in his own defense, and the circumstances are almost built for an actual crt course. The white now 18 year old, faces an almost entirely white jury of his peers, with the exception of one black man dream with me, paul. Could any child of color young person of color ever ever ever ever? Do that on a stand and get away with it? You already know joy, of course not. This is white privilege on steroids, again, theres, no racial angle here, everybodys the same color if a white guy shooting another white guy is an example of racism. Maybe you should tell us how this is insane just just so. You know: hey sean hannity here: hey click here to subscribe to fox news, youtube page and catch our hottest interviews and most compelling analysis.