Had internal video quality, so the next logical step is to compare it with dji flagship model, the mavic 3.. It might sound too many people like a crazy head to head, but in this video i will compare them in terms of footage quality under all different light conditions, including knight footage, a situation where the knight plus appear to come from a different galaxy. The price of the nano plus here in old europe is around 800 euro against over 2 000 for the mavic 3.. Obviously, video quality is not the only factor to analyze when choosing which model to buy the flagship model has a host of extra functionalities and for some users, the much longer battery life, the variable aperture, the power and wind resistance, the excellent hyperlapse mode and the telephoto Lens might be a reason good enough to pay the extra price. On the other hand, the nano plus is extremely light and portable and is below the threshold of 250 grams. Therefore, under very relaxed regulations, especially in urban environments, the mavic 3 has a 1.33 inch sensor with a variable aperture from f 2.8 to f 11. A video resolution of 5.1 k at the maximum frame rate of 50 frame per seconds can shoot 4k video at a whopping 120 frame per second for super slow motion. The maximum bit rate is 200 mbps. Another plus is at 0.78 inches sensor with a fixed aperture of f 1.9. It is able to shoot 4k video at a frame rate of up to 30 frames per seconds and at a maximum bit rate of 100 mbps.

The sensor has a ryy b color filter array design, which is supposed to increase low light and high dynamic range performance. The mavic 3 can shoot video in normal mode with 8 bit color space and has also a mode operating in a 10 bit color space d. Log, the nanoplus has a single color mode. It also has a default mode available, both in video and photo with 3 different strength levels. I find the fog very useful in easy conditions or to improve the structure of the sky. The 8 bit normal color mode. With my v3 is excellent throughout this video, i will be using it against the only mode available in the hotel nano this way. The comparison will also be very useful for users who dont rely on computer processing, but a basic color grading obviously helps to get even better results. Let me know your opinion about the quality of the footage with the 2 drone in the comment below and if you find the video interesting dont hesitate to give a thumbs up. It really helps the channel in these top down images. We take the sky and the dynamic range out of the equation and can concentrate on detail. Both clips are excellent, but i can detect more detail in the one taken with a nano plus, especially in the shadows. Moving to these zoomed in scenes containing leaves shrubs bare branches and a few architectural details. We can better appreciate the extra detail obtained with the nanoplus.

In this view of a village from above. Both drones have nice colors. It is a matter of personal preference, but then i know as certainly the edge in terms of detail, especially in the shadows. This is a bit surprising since the nanos has a lower resolution and a smaller sensor, but the nanoplus makes the most of the recent advanced technology and has always shown a sensational dynamic range. The mavic 3 performs really well, and the comparison is not embarrassing, as was the case with the two other dji models. Great things are getting really exciting and by the way you will find info and links about these two drones and the girl that i use in the description below overcast conditions always been a difficult test for drone footage, as it is not easy to retain structure in The sky and elements on the ground tend to get a bit mushy. The mavic 3 does a good job, considering the conditions, but the structure of the sky is a bit poor and at times there is some lack of detail in the buildings far away. In the background, the nano plus does a better job in rendering the sky, while the elements in the ground have more detail, this drone handles dynamic range, extremely well, maybe in part because of the ryyb color filter. I also much prefer the richness of the colors of the nanoplus for the clips in this chapter with a nano plus, i have to use the defog option at minimum strength.

It helps to further enhance the structure of the sky, but the element on the ground loses a bit of detail because of the extra contrast there is a bit of a trade off, so this function is useful. Only specific situations, the performance in overcast condition is, in my opinion, a win for the nano plus, but the mavic 3 is putting up a fight here. We are in pleasant light conditions, a couple of hours before sunset and there is less difference in the performance of the two drones, its mostly a matter of personal preference. So this time its up to you to judge between the two in the comments below. But when i watch this clip shot with nanoplus, the colors look like a painting of a great master, the sky and the sea are breathtaking and look at the difference in the tale in the town. In the background here, the sun is just outside the left edge of the frame and the result with the nanoplus is sensational. Both the sky and the detail in the shadows on the ground are excellent. The mavic, 3 doesnt even try to compete once again. The dynamic range of this tiny bird is beyond belief, even against the sun. Behind clouds nanoplus steals their shoe. Lets start with mavic 3, because if you have not yet watched knight footage shot with nanoplus, the experience can be shocking until the reason the nanoplus, the mavic 3, was the best prosumer drone in low light by a good margin.

But things move really really fast in this industry. It is pitch dark and we are using an iso value of 3200 Music. The areas with artificial lighting have decent detail and color, but there is no info at all in the shadows and overall luminosity is a bit low. There is a good deal of noise, but it is a level that can still be recovered. Using neat video, you can watch my video about this excellent denoiser by clicking on this link and you will find info about it in the description below the mavic. 3 is, in my opinion, the only drone of the mavic line that can get acceptable footage in such dark conditions with nanoplus we enter and charter territories for night foot touch. I know that most of you will not believe me, but the light conditions were absolutely the same, probably due to the combination of the ryyb color filter, with a large f 1.9 aperture of the sensor in low light conditions, the nanoplus destroys any drone ive tried and It is also better than several full frame cameras, luminosity detail. Color rendition and lack of noise are beyond belief under pitch dark conditions. The footage is almost the same as during the day, this shootout sounded too many people like a crazy idea, but overall for video quality, the nano plus beats the mavic 3 in most departments and cannot even be compared for night footage. These two drones are the one that will stay in my back from now on the evo nano in light winds and for urban shooting the mavic 3.

For other occasions, click on this link to watch my in depth. Analysis of the footage quality of the evo nano plus dont forget to hit the like button.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePzmWezIoOM